Research & Best Practices

Best Practices for Achieving Better OEE in Manufacturing

img

Improvement in manufacturing productivity, efficiency and effectiveness is a goal that’s shared across every manufacturing company. In the course of pursuing improvement, the method by which you measure success is critical to the results you’ll see. One of the best metrics used to drive improvement in manufacturing is OEE (overall equipment effectiveness). Below, we’ll answer the question “What is OEE?” and take an in-depth look at each contributing factor. We’ll also examine some OEE best practices to help improve your results.

What is OEE in manufacturing?

As a broad definition, overall equipment effectiveness is an aggregate statistic for a machine or a group of similar machines. It benchmarks equipment uptime, overall output and quality output. OEE compares actual outputs and results in several areas against standard or expected results, producing an overall number that can be used as a baseline for future improvement. The general formula for OEE is Availability x Performance x Quality, multiplying three percentages to determine the final number.

OEE in manufacturing is one of the most consistent, reliable and actionable ways to measure productivity. OEE is measured as a percentage and indicates the proportion of operating time that is spent producing usable parts, in other words, time that is productive or effective in meeting operational goals.

The general formula for OEE is Availability x Performance x Quality, multiplying three percentages to determine the final number. If your overall equipment effectiveness formula results in 100%, that means that your equipment is producing 100% of parts to spec — at full capacity with zero unplanned downtime. This is the goal to which manufacturers should aspire, especially when implementing OEE maintenance strategies.

Chart presenting optimal performance levels.

If you’re wondering how to measure OEE data points, they can be calculated using the following methods:

Availability

The Availability metric compares actual machine production time with standard or expected uptime. This measurement factors in unexpected downtime and other production losses – such as setup and adjustment time. However, it does not factor in planned or scheduled downtime (scheduled maintenance and lunch breaks). Availability is calculated as Actual Available Time (scheduled time minus unplanned downtime) divided by Scheduled Run Time, resulting in a percentage.

Availability equation.

Performance

The performance consists of the total output of equipment in a given time period (such as a shift) as related to the expected output. This metric is a raw number that includes all units produced, whether or not they are accepted or rejected. The performance metric is calculated as Total Piece Output divided by Standard or Expected Output. Standard output can be provided by OEM documentation or may be arrived at by calculating your output averages over a long period.

Performance equation.

Quality

Quality measures the “right first-time” output of equipment, providing insight into lost time due to repairs, rejections and secondary processes. Quality is calculated as Right-First-Time Output divided by Actual Total Output.

Quality equation.

Once you have calculated each of these percentages, multiply them to arrive at your OEE. It is also possible to arrive at a quick, rough OEE calculation with the following equation: Ideal cycle time for one part, multiplied by the total number of accepted parts in a given time period. Take the product of this multiplication and divide that number by the total time period in question (ensuring that units of measure are consistent in all aspects of the equation).

Overall equipment effectiveness equation.

OEE best practices

It is important to note that by itself, OEE does not have much significance. Benchmarking OEE against other facilities, or even other machines or processes in your facility, will not yield actionable insights. When you calculate OEE for multiple machines, the data is best used as a benchmark for future production efficiency improvements, always comparing “like to like” — that is, similar machines and processes to each other. Several best practices for OEE in maintenance can help to maintain and improve your OEE. These include:

  • Reducing downtime: Proper preventive and predictive maintenance can reduce unplanned downtime, improving the Availability statistics and increasing overall OEE.
  • Skilled workers: Workers with deep expertise in specific maintenance processes can improve machine uptime and increase quality rates by drawing upon their knowledge to quickly maintain equipment for optimal results. Reduced setup time will increase the Availability metric, and improved throughput may increase Performance and Quality measurements.
  • Data and technology: Connected machinery, sensors, computer maintenance management systems (CMMS) and other state-of-the-art technology can provide the most accurate insights into your actual output, and over time can provide a detailed and accurate snapshot of performance expectations. With these numbers in hand, you can be assured that your OEE calculation is as accurate, consistent and effective as possible.

How to improve OEE in manufacturing

There are a number of ways that manufacturers can improve effectiveness metrics. These includes:

  • Determine critical assets: Identify and focus on the equipment and components that are the major drivers of the measures of OEE, especially those that contribute to machinery uptime, measured as Availability.
  • Upgrade IIoT capabilities that focus on real-time data collection and automation: Data collection and monitoring are among the most effective ways to reduce or eliminate unplanned downtime, and industrial sensors are the most cost-effective way to implement these strategies. Machine health monitoring plans such as Reliability 360® from ATS are a proven way to gain the benefits of this technology, along with the right knowledge to effectively use the data.
  • Assign a technician as an overseer of OEE implementation and monitoring: While OEE should be a top-down strategy that every technician and operator should be aware of, it is also critical to ensure that there are dedicated personnel focusing strictly on OEE monitoring because this way of operating often requires new methods of working and measuring.
  • Utilize data visualization to display real-time OEE to employees: OEE is an ongoing measure, and every minute of downtime and every rejected part will detract from the OEE rating. By displaying real-time performance metrics, employees will remain focused on the goal at hand increasing OEE with an eye toward 100%.
  • Focus on enhanced employee engagement and communication, which leads to higher productivity and fewer accidents/defects: By creating a sense of buy-in and ownership over OEE and other performance metrics, employees will be more engaged and focused on their tasks and less likely to make mistakes that can pose safety risks, while also reducing OEE.
  • Schedule regular reviews of daily operations across departments in the production process: OEE should not be an annual or a quarterly check-in — it is critical to keep tabs on operations as frequently as possible, which is facilitated by the data collected via industrial sensors. Reviewing operations at least daily ensures that focus remains where it should.

OEE improvement with ATS

As a factory maintenance solution service provider with over three decades of equipment maintenance experience, ATS workforce, industrial maintenance and MRO solutions are geared to help you a baseline and improve OEE. Our goal is to address skills gaps in your organization, boost uptime and quality output, and assist with technology consulting and implementation to bring your existing equipment into the modern manufacturing landscape, ensuring you have the most accurate production and effectiveness measurement possible. For more information about how we can help you with OEE improvement, contact us today.

Let’s Talk

Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.