While there are significant overlaps between manufacturing cost and production cost, the terms are not identical.
Put simply, manufacturing cost is a component of production cost. As a result, it’s easy for companies to use these terms interchangeably.
In some cases, the distinction has minimal impact. In others, unclear cost terminology can lead to over- or under-spending, causing companies to miss key margins or fall behind the competition.
Here’s what companies need to know about manufacturing cost, production cost, where they differ and how applying the right term to the right processes can help optimize operations.
What is manufacturing cost?
Manufacturing cost is the total cost to produce goods. There are three components used to calculate total manufacturing costs: direct materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead.
- Direct materials: Direct materials include all tangible inputs required to create a finished product. This includes raw materials, prebuilt components and assembly items such as screws and wires.
- Direct labor: Direct labour cost refers to the salaries or hourly wages paid to workers who operate production line machinery or directly assemble parts.
- Manufacturing overhead: Overhead accounts for indirect costs. Common examples of manufacturing overhead include utilities such as water and electricity, equipment maintenance and indirect labor costs such as those for facility managers or maintenance staff. Some expenses, such as rent, are fixed costs, while others, such as hourly wages, are variable costs. Calculating accurate manufacturing costs is important for both financial reporting and inventory valuation. For example, if you know that the manufacturing cost of an item is $20, the item sells for $50 and you have 200 in stock, that stock is worth $6,000 – $10,000 in sales revenue minus $4,000 in manufacturing cost.
What is production cost?
Production cost is the total cost of running production operations. It differs from manufacturing cost because it includes manufacturing cost along with other costs to determine the expenses of production from start to finish.
Key components of production cost include:
- Sales and marketing
- Administrative labor tied to production output
- Capital expenses
- Shipping costs
Compared to manufacturing cost, production cost focuses more on operations than output. Where manufacturing cost identifies the components and labor required to produce outputs, production cost reflects all the spending required to keep operations up and running.
Key differences between manufacturing cost and production cost
Manufacturing cost is accounting-focused because it speaks to a single organizational function. Manufacturing cost data is typically used to complete financial statements and conduct inventory valuations.
Production cost is more operations-focused because it encompasses multiple processes across the organization. Production cost data is used to assess overall production efficiency and performance.
Aspect | Manufacturing cost | Production cost |
Definition | Costs directly tied to transforming materials into finished goods | Total costs of producing and delivering goods, including manufacturing and non-manufacturing expenses |
Components | Direct costs such as materials and labor, along with manufacturing overhead cost | Manufacturing costs plus selling, administrative and distribution expenses |
Classification | Inventorial (capitalized on balance sheets until sold) | Period costs for non-manufacturing processes |
Focus | Factory and production floor activities | Entire business operations related to production and sales |
Use in budgeting | Basis for cost of goods sold (COGS) when products are sold | Used for overall profitability analysis and pricing decisions |
Why the difference matters for manufacturers
Understanding and tracking both manufacturing and production costs is critical for companies to ensure stable and profitable operations.
If manufacturers focus solely on a single cost view, they may overlook opportunities or miss important inefficiencies.
Consider an organization that prioritizes manufacturing cost but largely ignores total production cost. If the price of materials and labor remains steady even as sales, shipping and product costs fluctuate, the result is an illusion of consistency that can undermine efforts to create accurate budgets and forecasts.
The opposite approach is also problematic. If businesses take a high-level view of production costs but don’t dig into the details of manufacturing costs, they may face rising expenses with no obvious root cause. While an in-depth investigation of manufacturing processes would reveal rising amounts of unplanned downtime and process inefficiencies, choosing to prioritize production cost puts the company at a disadvantage.
Concurrent cost analysis offers actionable insight that drives more informed pricing, marginal cost and investment decisions.
The role of maintenance in controlling costs
Equipment performance directly impacts the amount of materials and labor required to produce parts or products. Performance also impacts capital expenses; if a piece of equipment fails and must be replaced, this is a significant line item.
Effective maintenance strategies can reduce both production and manufacturing costs.
There are three common approaches to maintenance:
- Reactive maintenance: Reactive maintenance occurs after machines fail or unplanned downtime occurs. Also called emergency maintenance, this approach often leads to higher repair costs and lost output because teams can’t predict when problems will happen, only react to them after the fact.
- Preventive maintenance: Preventive maintenance anticipates potential problems. This type of maintenance is typically scheduled. For example, maintenance teams might check critical equipment on the 1st of each month, even if it has been operating without any issues. This helps spot potential problems before they become big issues.
- Predictive maintenance: Predictive maintenance takes this a step further with in-depth analysis to carry out root cause failure analysis (RCFA). This enables teams to identify the source of issues rather than the symptoms, in turn reducing industrial maintenance costs over time.
Preventive and predictive maintenance lay the groundwork for a standardized approach that reduces variability and lowers the need for reactive maintenance. While it’s impossible to avoid every unexpected failure, standardizing preventive and predictive maintenance practices can limit the risk of unplanned downtime, minimize the impact of equipment failures and help teams optimize maintenance processes to reduce both the Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) and Mean Time to Repair (MTTR).
Using cost data to improve decision-making
Combined cost data helps improve business decision-making. Advantages of a dual-data approach include:
- Identifying high-cost assets or processes
- Prioritizing capital investments
- Evaluating process improvements
By considering the impact of changes in manufacturing processes on production operations, and vice versa, companies can make decisions that balance the best interests of both.
Aligning cost metrics across the organization
Shared cost understanding is critical for companies to track spending, prioritize improvements and create long-term strategies.
Achieving this goal, however, requires consistent measurement and management of critical cost metrics. These may include manufacturing cycle time, total cost of goods sold (COGS), mean time between failure (MTBF) and average labor costs.
Simply having these metrics isn’t enough. Turning information into action requires cross-functional alignment.
This starts with the standardization of cost definitions and metrics. Companies need to identify and apply common terminology across production and manufacturing processes. This ensures that metric data is portable and consistent for all users.
Next is aligning the finance and operations teams. Both play a role in cost management—operations teams request budget changes or increases, and finance teams approve or deny them. Alignment helps ensure that critical details aren’t lost in translation.
It’s also important to use consistent reporting frameworks. For example, companies may opt for computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) paired with enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions to create a consistent, centralized source of truth for cost data.
Finally, it’s critical to establish accountability for manufacturing and operating cost drivers. This starts at the top: The C-suite should select leaders to take ownership of cost tracking, assessment and management, and give them the resources and authority required to make investments or changes as needed.
Cost clarity enables better manufacturing performance
Cost clarity offers a competitive advantage for manufacturing companies. While tracking manufacturing cost helps identify areas for performance and process improvement, monitoring production cost enables better long-term decision-making that supports budget and revenue goals.
Tracking both in tandem enables organizations to improve operational efficiency and reliability without sacrificing profitability. In addition, this approach lays the groundwork for proactive and predictive maintenance cost savings through the reduced risk of machine failures or unexpected downtime.
Improve cost control and clarity with maintenance services from ATS. Let’s talk.
